Courts won't reveal rulings in adoption cases - Sunday Telegraph
Extract
"Family courts are refusing to tell mothers why their babies are being taken away and put up for forced adoption.
Two mothers have told The Sunday Telegraph that their pain at losing their children was made worse by not knowing the grounds on which judges took the decisions.
Both women had their requests for copies of the judgments turned down repeatedly. As a result, they were prevented from launching legal battles to win their babies back, because appeals cannot be lodged without -written judgments.
Critics claimed that the cases are an extreme example of the secrecy that runs throughout the family court system. Earlier this summer, the Government abandoned plans to open up hearings to the media.
John Hemming, the Liberal Democrat MP and chairman of Justice for Families, said: "It seems quite strange that somebody can have their child removed and adopted, and the system will not give reasons.
"This arises from the secrecy of proceedings and the fact that people are allowed to misbehave professionally in the family courts without any fear of sanctions against them."
The cases are the latest in a series highlighted by this newspaper which have raised concerns about the workings of the family courts and social services. "
The secrecy of the family courts is a national scandal and harms many children and parents. Let us hope John Hemming manages to bring about much-needed improvements in this unjust, cruel system.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Somehow I can't see the courts being honest about this: "Mr and Mrs X want a little blonde-haired, blue-eyed girl and so we are taking your daughter from you, and besides, there's a lot of money in this for us, and there's not a thing you can do about it."
ReplyDelete